The Arab Spring has not yet made it to London, but the riots and looting that have erupted across London following the shooting of "Gangster" Mark Duggan have given some hints as to how the general populace would react in the event of any sort of uprising: sitting at home, watching the news on Facebook, blaming the neighbours. Many people seem to be drawing parallels with the Broadwater Farm riots in the 80's, but for me a more recent riot is best for comparison - the 2005 Troubles at Ikea, Edmonton.
Then as now the blame was given to people coming in from somewhere else to cause trouble. To me, this has always seemed a slightly disingenuous accusation, portraying the bad-doers as jumping onto coaches and hightailing it to London at the first sign of things getting a bit tasty. Over the last two days, trouble has broken out in Tottenham, Enfield, Walthamstowe, Dalston, Wood Green, and Brixton. Now, leaving aside Brixton for a moment (because just a quick google shows that there have been at least three local protests there this year that turned a bit tasty) and what stands out about the remaining locations? Dalston to Enfield is the route of the A10; Wood Green is a few minutes to the west, Walthamstowe a few minutes to the east further north. To get to Walthamstowe from Tottenham, the easiest route it to travel north a little way and then turn onto the North Circular, at Edmonton.
London is often described as a collection of towns and villages with nothing in-between. It's a valid description in the most part, as many of the nicer parts of London find themselves surrounded by menacing estates and industrial areas, or simply corralled by the A roads around which the capital's workforce flows. For the most part, it's a situation that draws no attention to itself, as each of the nicer areas has made itself self-sufficient for shopping and nights out, and the areas in-between raise no voice and offer no temptation. It becomes second nature to anyone who lives in London to subconsciously ignore the places they pass when journeying from one village to another.
London has always been a city of temporary residence; any arguments about immigration need only pointing in the direction of the likes of the Huguenots for a historical perspective on the situation. One must also consider why the A10 is such a major route through London in the first place; it's actually an old Roman road called Ermine Street, and they were hardly native.
The route of the road has not always been an in-between place; my father is fond of pointing out one of the few Art Deco churchs in England - almost opposite the police station where all the recent trouble started. For at least twenty years though, most of the route of the A10 has been allowed to become disenfranchised. When I see people talking about the local community in places like Tottenham or Edmonton, I stop believing a word they say about the area. There is no community of Tottenham or Edmonton; these are places other communities settle in a while, holding pens for the disenfranchised people of other communities, who sometimes happen to get stuck there for a generation.
The trouble taking place now is happening because most of the people who live there do not care. My father has lived in Edmonton for over twenty years; in that time the groups standing on the corner of the A10 and the A406 have gone from being Turkish to Somalian, and no doubt in another ten years another group will take their place. Although for the most part the first generation of immigrants to the in-between neighborhoods of London are there to just get on with their lives, their children, as they grow up, find themselves in no-mans land. In my opinion, these riots are a protest, against the temporary wasteland so many people find themselves stuck in, part of no community but the greater poor of London.